gdelgiblueeyes: (0)
gdelgiblueeyes ([personal profile] gdelgiblueeyes) wrote in [community profile] johnheartpaul 2018-04-15 06:10 pm (UTC)

Re: Blog Item

Point 1 is literally the only reason I brought it up here; I've only ever seen it discussed at all, as rare as it is, in JHP. Someone either had to have read about it, or been the person who speculated about it to begin with, to include it in this item.

As for Point 3, I mean, in the era when John was practically canonized, Paul was kind of regarded as the lame one. John got way more brownie points with the American rock press than Paul throughout the Seventies as well, and some of the effects of that still lingers in the public consciousness. I don't think he's the lame one at all, but I can see why someone writing the blind item would go with calling him the lame one.

All I can do is shake my head over it all.

Post a comment in response:

This community only allows commenting by members. You may comment here if you're a member of johnheartpaul.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org